nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 14:25:51 -0400
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:37:10 +0200, Brad Knowles said:
But just because IPv6 has problems doesn't mean that it doesn't solve the fundamental address space problem in IPv4, and doesn't mean that it is anything less than the best available alternative.
OK, I'll bite.. :) Is there another alternative running around wearing a t-shirt that says "I'm the best there is, but I'm not available"? ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 04)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Rob Evans (Jul 04)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 04)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 04)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 04)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Carlos Friacas (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Jeroen Massar (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Meyer (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Maimon (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Stephen Sprunk (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Petri Helenius (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Niels Bakker (Jul 01)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 03)