nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 00:43:50 +0200
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:34:53AM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
But it certainly looks like a small DFZ table and portable address space are fundamentally incompatible.
At least if you want all the advantages that real BGP multihoming has. Not surprising. :-) Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott McGrath (Jul 07)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Meyer (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Eric Rescorla (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Abley (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Daniel Roesen (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Sean Doran (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 06)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 06)