nanog mailing list archives

Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:45:12 -0400

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:16:57 +0200, codewarrior () cuseeme de said:
On Jul 3, 2005, at 5:01 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 10:15:10 +0200, Peter Dambier said:
People will want IPv9 with total gouvernement control. Especially  
in China
and the US.
The fact that something is neither available nor technically feasible has
never stopped people from wanting it...
this was made as an example and would mean we are stuck here , aren t  
we?

No, it means that we need to progress in directions that are available and
technically feasible.

I recently went to a car dealer *wanting* to spend $400 on a 2005 car that
got 4,000 miles to the gallon and guaranteed perfect safety in any conceivable
crash.  Of course, said car is neither available nor technically feasible.
That didn't stop the salesman and myself from coming to acceptable terms
on a slightly older Toyota Camry for slightly more money, said Camry being
both available and technically feasible... 

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: