nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:25:31 +0300
Peter Dambier wrote:
Unfortunately the autoconfiguration did not fix the combined identifier and network address issue both ipv4 and ipv6 have. If it would have done that, multihoming would not be an issue with ipv6 today. (and probably neither with ipv4)David Conrad wrote:The good thing with IPv6 is autoconfiguration. There is no need to renumber.With the radvd daemon running your box builds its own ip as soon as you plug it in. If your box is allowed then give it a global address from the radvd. Your box does not care about the changed address. It will happyly use it.
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Meyer (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Maimon (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Stephen Sprunk (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Petri Helenius (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Niels Bakker (Jul 01)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 01)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Todd Vierling (Jul 02)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Peter Dambier (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Petri Helenius (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Peter Dambier (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 codewarrior (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Sean Doran (Jul 02)