nanog mailing list archives
Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william () elan net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 07:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote:
You miss the point. Reputation is already widely being used today - every blocklist is a reputation system
Strike that point. Not every blocklist is reputation system, though the most widely used ones like SBL, SORBS, SPAMCOP are all like that. But there others simply provide certain info about corresponding ip ordomain which is derived from domain info itself (like what country its from, if its bogon/not-allocated space for ip, etc), those would be closer accreditation data.
I seriously doubt this distinction is that important for those at nanog. But anyway, I had to correct myself, since my statement was not accurate. -- William Leibzon Elan Networks william () elan net
Current thread:
- Re: Email peering, (continued)
- Re: Email peering Petri Helenius (Jun 21)
- Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?] Petri Helenius (Jun 18)
- Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?] Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 16)
- Re: Economics of spam Niels Bakker (Jun 13)
- Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?] Todd Vierling (Jun 13)
- Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 13)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? Matt Ghali (Jun 10)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? J.D. Falk (Jun 09)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? Daniel Golding (Jun 08)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? william(at)elan.net (Jun 08)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? william(at)elan.net (Jun 08)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 08)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? Eric A. Hall (Jun 08)
- Paper on Email Authentication (Authorization really) (was - Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?) william(at)elan.net (Jun 13)
- Re: Paper on Email Authentication (Authorization really) (was - Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?) J.D. Falk (Jun 13)
- Re: Paper on Email Authentication (Authorization really) (was - Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?) william(at)elan.net (Jun 13)
- Re: Paper on Email Authentication (Authorization really) (was - Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?) J.D. Falk (Jun 13)