nanog mailing list archives
Re: Email peering
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:55:54 +0300
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
The problem with countermeasures that would actually hurt the source of junk heavily enough would also have to hurt "legitimate" traffic making you an immediate lawsuit magnet. If that would not be the case, or some larger parties feel they could stand despite this fact, the problem would be fairly straightforward to reduce to a fraction in a few months time."The best place to stop abuse is as near its source as possible." Meaning: it's far easier for network X to stop abuse from leaving its network than it is for 100,000 other networks to defend themselves from it. Especially since techniques for doing so (for instance, controlling outbound SMTP spam) are well-known, heavily documented, and easily put into service.
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: Email peering, (continued)
- Re: Email peering John Levine (Jun 18)
- Re: Email peering Mike Leber (Jun 18)
- Re: Email peering John Levine (Jun 18)
- Re: Email peering Alexei Roudnev (Jun 19)
- Re: Email peering Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 20)
- Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?] Michael . Dillon (Jun 17)
- Message not available
- Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's SenderIDAuthentication......?] Ben Hubbard (Jun 17)
- Re: Email peering Michael . Dillon (Jun 17)
- Message not available
- Re: Email peering Ben Hubbard (Jun 17)
- Re: Email peering Rich Kulawiec (Jun 21)
- Re: Email peering Petri Helenius (Jun 21)
- Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?] Petri Helenius (Jun 18)
- Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?] Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 16)
- Re: Economics of spam Niels Bakker (Jun 13)
- Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?] Todd Vierling (Jun 13)
- Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 13)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? Matt Ghali (Jun 10)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? J.D. Falk (Jun 09)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? Daniel Golding (Jun 08)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? william(at)elan.net (Jun 08)
- Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......? william(at)elan.net (Jun 08)