nanog mailing list archives
Re: classful routes redux
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:03:40 -0500
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 21:41:48 +0200, Pekka Savola said:
Seems a bit irresponsible to me. Personally I'd rather focus on cleaning up the AS number mess a bit rather than throwing more technology at the problem.
All the same, we need to start the technology throw now, because it's well known that the cleanup won't happen until far too late - by the time it gets painful enough that actual cleaning happens, we won't have enough lead time to deploy technology. Personally, I'd rather focus on making sure that a 75% complete cleanup doesn't result in us falling 5% short with no alternate plan already in place and ready to turn on.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: classful routes redux, (continued)
- Re: classful routes redux Michael . Dillon (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Per Heldal (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Michael . Dillon (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Per Heldal (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Michael . Dillon (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Stephen Sprunk (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Joseph S D Yao (Nov 09)
- Message not available
- IPv6 in a current defaultless SFP ISP John Dupuy (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Pekka Savola (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Geoff Huston (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Randy Bush (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Randy Bush (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Geoff Huston (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Randy Bush (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Geoff Huston (Nov 04)
- Message not available
- Re: classful routes redux Geoff Huston (Nov 05)
- Re: classful routes redux Marshall Eubanks (Nov 05)
- Re: classful routes redux Paul Vixie (Nov 03)