nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT: Xen
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:43:06 +0200
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:11:32AM +1000, Matthew Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org> wrote a message of 14 lines which said:
Fairly well -- a lot better than (eg) vservers, and almost certainly better than UMLs.
Because they are different virtualisation solutions with different requirments. If you have unrelated customers, who do not trust each other, Xen (or UML) is OK. If you just want to put one service on a different machine but do not have the money (or the rack space) to dedicate a box to just DHCP, Linux Vservers or FreeBSD jails are fine.
Current thread:
- Re: OT: Xen, (continued)
- Re: OT: Xen Eric Frazier (Apr 03)
- Re: OT: Xen Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 03)
- Re: OT: Xen Todd Vierling (Apr 03)
- Re: OT: Xen Michael . Dillon (Apr 03)
- Message not available
- Re: OT: Xen Eric Frazier (Apr 03)
- Re: OT: Xen Todd Vierling (Apr 03)
- Re: OT: Xen Peter Dambier (Apr 03)
- Re: OT: Xen Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 03)
- Re: OT: Xen Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 03)
- Re: OT: Xen Matthew Palmer (Apr 03)
- Re: OT: Xen Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 04)
- Re: OT: Xen Matthew Palmer (Apr 03)