nanog mailing list archives
Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:26:47 -0600
Funny that shim6 is being mentioned. The corresponding open mic session at 35 showed how gathering people for 20 minutes of complaining can effectively replace long, protracted email threads.
and what was the effect in the ietf? zippo. randy
Current thread:
- Re: IRS goes IPv6!, (continued)
- Re: IRS goes IPv6! Bruce Pinsky (Feb 14)
- protocols that don't meet the need... Tony Hain (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 14)
- RE: protocols that don't meet the need... Tony Hain (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Jared Mauch (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Marshall Eubanks (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Per Heldal (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... william(at)elan.net (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Michael . Dillon (Feb 15)
- shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Randy Bush (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) David Meyer (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Per Heldal (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: IRS goes IPv6! Matt Ghali (Feb 15)