Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)

["Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>]

RB> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:26:47 -0600
RB> From: Randy Bush

RB> and what was the effect in the ietf?  zippo.

Exactly.  I'm claiming that the meeting was a more effective vehicle 
than a mailing list for the group of people involved -- NANOGers.  I'm 
also suggesting that, by extension, cross-pollination between NANOG and 
IETF meetings would be more efficient than simple forays onto "the 
other mailing list" (with "other" defined by one's perspective).


Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.