nanog mailing list archives
RE: keeping the routing table in check: step 1
From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:23:23 +0000 (GMT)
SM> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:05:20 -0500 SM> From: Scott Morris SM> I guess my question is, what's the point of asking this question now? IPv6 is still fairly green-field. Future IPv4 allocations will be made, too. Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/ Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita ________________________________________________________________________ DO NOT send mail to the following addresses: davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked. Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
Current thread:
- keeping the routing table in check: step 1 Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- RE: keeping the routing table in check: step 1 Scott Morris (Feb 15)
- RE: keeping the routing table in check: step 1 Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: keeping the routing table in check: step 1 Michael . Dillon (Feb 16)
- RE: keeping the routing table in check: step 1 Ray Plzak (Feb 16)
- RE: keeping the routing table in check: step 1 Scott Morris (Feb 15)