nanog mailing list archives
Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:24:36 -0500
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:51:16PM -0800, John A. Kilpatrick wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Edward B. DREGER wrote:Stop. Examine. Think. Then respond.
Something about history repeating applies. those who weren't around then should re-visit tli's ISPAC proposal from 96 and the associated discussion on both nanog and cidrd archives before regurgitating it. Flatly, there are economic pressures to carry deaggregates and they have undermined/reversed the progress from cidr. Solve that [approaches other than longest-match always wins] or else yes the issue will carry to v6. This is one aspect of the "get ietf to re-examine routing" folks at the sessions were on about. Then we get back to "the ietf is composed of vendors who want to see your capital dollars on a recurring basis" sub-topic... Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...), (continued)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Paul Jakma (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Andre Oppermann (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Chip Mefford (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Paul Jakma (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) John A. Kilpatrick (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Joe Provo (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Mike Leber (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Andre Oppermann (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Tony Finch (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Michael . Dillon (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Fred Baker (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Michael . Dillon (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Vince Fuller (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) David Meyer (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) william(at)elan.net (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) James R. Cutler (Feb 16)