nanog mailing list archives
Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:05:35 -0500
On Feb 15, 2006, at 2:30 PM, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
The biggest problem is when customer's link to provider A goes down andinbound traffic must flow through provider B. This necessitates some sort of path between A and B where more-specifics can flow.
Are most of the multihomers REALLY a one router shop (implied by your renumbering is easy comment) - although shim6 could help there I guess.
You've also eliminated any possibility of the end multihomed site doing any ingress traffic engineering. I suppose they can do egress which is better than shim6 allows... but in today's world where I get a completely different price for transit than my neighbor - this plan is going to screw some the multihomed sites financially.
Current thread:
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...), (continued)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Paul Jakma (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Chris Adams (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Andre Oppermann (Feb 15)
- RE: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Ejay Hire (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Andre Oppermann (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) John Payne (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 16)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Marshall Eubanks (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Paul Jakma (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Andre Oppermann (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Chip Mefford (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Paul Jakma (Feb 15)
- Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)