nanog mailing list archives

Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday


From: Todd Underwood <todd-nanog () renesys com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:02:11 -0400


randy, all,

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:37:01AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
michael, all,

[ if you can't use procmail, could you at least respond to non-ops
  trolls on the nanog-futures list? ]

indeed.  i don't use the former but i should have used the latter.
apologies.  

but todd, you have a bit of clue.  do you have a clue at all
regarding the question i asked on-list the other day?

    what is the security policy that isc plans to use over the
    content of the isc dlv registry?  and how will the dvl trust
    key roll-over and revocation be handled?

i don't.  i've been reading the spec recently and trying to catch up
on the contents of the recent nanog meeting that i was unable to
attend.  i've been a long-term sceptic of dns-sec due to the lack of
any movement on the issuing of a root key (and the multiple,
incompatible changes in the protocol itself), but this effort looks
interesting. 

if the above can not be very clearly answered (by isc?), then this
proposal is techno-political hubris at best.

yes, or an interesting proof-of-concept that can be taken-up and
completed by someone else.

t.

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
todd underwood                                 +1 603 643 9300 x101
renesys corporation                            chief of operations & security 
todd () renesys com                               http://www.renesys.com/blog/todd.shtml


Current thread: