nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Amplification Attacks
From: Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:39:55 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Peter Dambier wrote:
How about alternative roots? ICANN does censor "XN--55QX5D.", "XN--FIQS8S." and "XN--IO0A7I." already. You must use alternative roots to exchange emails with people living in those domains.
Stop with the bull$**+ (self-censored), trying to recast the "censorship" light on the issue of alternate roots. ICANN is censoring nothing; it's "alternative" roots that are taking it upon themselves not to go through a standardization process by creating nonstandard naming trees. I encourage you to look up the English definition of "censor" sometime. -- -- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com> <todd () vierling name>
Current thread:
- DNS Amplification Attacks Gadi Evron (Mar 17)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks ennova2005-nanog (Mar 17)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Sean Donelan (Mar 19)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Gadi Evron (Mar 20)
- RE: DNS Amplification Attacks Geo. (Mar 20)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Gadi Evron (Mar 20)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Joseph S D Yao (Mar 20)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Peter Dambier (Mar 20)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Todd Vierling (Mar 20)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Florian Weimer (Mar 22)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Peter Dambier (Mar 22)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Florian Weimer (Mar 22)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Joseph S D Yao (Mar 22)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Peter Dambier (Mar 23)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Joseph S D Yao (Mar 25)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Sean Donelan (Mar 19)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks ennova2005-nanog (Mar 17)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Andy Davidson (Mar 20)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Joseph S D Yao (Mar 21)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Florian Weimer (Mar 22)
- Re: DNS Amplification Attacks Peter Dambier (Mar 22)