nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:27:56 -0400
On Wed, 24 May 2006 10:39:05 EDT, Christian Kuhtz said:
Now, now, Steinar, we all know that cannot be true. Case and point, everyone has implemented RFC 3514, just because it has been published as a standard.
Actually, it's Informational rather than Standards Track. However, since there were patches for both a *BSD variant and Linux, we can probably scare up two interoperable implementations so we can move it along Standards Track. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs], (continued)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Sean Donelan (May 23)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Martin Hannigan (May 23)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Michael . Dillon (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Peter Dambier (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics sthaug (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Michael . Dillon (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Peter Dambier (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics sthaug (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Christian Kuhtz (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Peter Dambier (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Valdis . Kletnieks (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Christian Kuhtz (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Steven M. Bellovin (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Sean Donelan (May 23)
- Message not available
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Martin Hannigan (May 24)