nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics
From: Christian Kuhtz <christian () kuhtz com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:50:55 -0400
On May 24, 2006, at 3:27 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 10:39:05 EDT, Christian Kuhtz said:Now, now, Steinar, we all know that cannot be true. Case and point, everyone has implemented RFC 3514, just because it has been published as a standard.Actually, it's Informational rather than Standards Track.
Nitpicky bugger, good grief. ;-) It's an RFC, therefore it is gospel. ;-)
However, sincethere were patches for both a *BSD variant and Linux, we can probably scare up two interoperable implementations so we can move it along Standards Track. :)
Stop, Vladis, stop, you're scarying me. ;-)
Current thread:
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs], (continued)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Martin Hannigan (May 23)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Michael . Dillon (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Peter Dambier (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics sthaug (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Michael . Dillon (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Peter Dambier (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics sthaug (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Christian Kuhtz (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Peter Dambier (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Valdis . Kletnieks (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Christian Kuhtz (May 24)
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics Steven M. Bellovin (May 24)
- Message not available
- Re: ISP compliance < LEAs - tech and logistics [was: snfc21 sniffer docs] Martin Hannigan (May 24)