nanog mailing list archives
Re: register.com down sev0?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:57:01 -0700
I don't want to detract from the heat of this discussion, as important as it is, but it (the discussion) illustrates a point that RIPE has recognized -- and is actively perusing -- yet, ISPs on this continent seem consistently to ignore: The consistent implementation of BCP 38.
oh? you have knowledge that this botnet attack used spoofed source addresses? randy
Current thread:
- Re: register.com down sev0? - More information, (continued)
- Re: register.com down sev0? - More information Chris Adams (Oct 26)
- Re: register.com down sev0? - More information Donald Stahl (Oct 26)
- Re: register.com down sev0? - More information Charles Gucker (Oct 26)
- Re: register.com down sev0? Joseph S D Yao (Oct 27)
- Re: register.com down sev0? Chris L. Morrow (Oct 28)
- Re: register.com down sev0? Chris Adams (Oct 28)
- Re: register.com down sev0? Jim Popovitch (Oct 28)
- Re: register.com down sev0? Donald Stahl (Oct 28)
- BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 (was Re: register.com down sev0?) Sean Donelan (Oct 25)
- Re: register.com down sev0? Randy Bush (Oct 25)
- Re: register.com down sev0? Chris L. Morrow (Oct 26)
- Re: register.com down sev0? Randy Bush (Oct 26)
- Re: register.com down sev0? Gadi Evron (Oct 26)
- Re: 10,352 active botnets (was Re: register.com down sev0? Matthew Crocker (Oct 26)
- Re: 10,352 active botnets (was Re: register.com down sev0? Jack Bates (Oct 26)
- Re: register.com down sev0? Jared Mauch (Oct 26)
- Re: register.com down sev0? Daniel Senie (Oct 26)
- RE: register.com down sev0? Tony Li (Oct 26)