nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 (was Re: register.com down sev0?)
From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:44:56 GMT
No. I think that is indicative of the problem. Don't you? - ferg -- Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Fergie wrote:
I don't want to detract from the heat of this discussion, as important as it is, but it (the discussion) illustrates a point that RIPE has recognized -- and is actively perusing -- yet, ISPs on this continent seem consistently to ignore: The consistent implementation of BCP 38. It is nothing less than irresponsible, IMO... Why _is_ that?
Do you have any data concerning the actual consistent deployment of BCP38++ in different parts of the world? -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 (was Re: register.com down sev0?) Fergie (Oct 25)
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 (was Re: register.com down sev0?) Sean Donelan (Oct 25)
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 (was Re: register.com down sev0?) Per Heldal (Oct 26)
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 (was Re: register.com down sev0?) Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 26)
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 Florian Weimer (Oct 26)
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 26)
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 + SPF Douglas Otis (Oct 26)
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 + SPF Michael . Dillon (Oct 27)
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 + SPF Chris L. Morrow (Oct 27)
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 + SPF Michael . Dillon (Oct 27)
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 + SPF Chris L. Morrow (Oct 27)
- Re: BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 (was Re: register.com down sev0?) Sean Donelan (Oct 25)