nanog mailing list archives

Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks


From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 23:41:47 GMT


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Chris Owen <owenc () hubris net> wrote:

On Apr 7, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Fergie wrote:

I would think that it's actually very easy to do when
sub-allocations are SWIP'ed.

Not that I'm really defending this policy, but sub-allocations are  
very often not SWIPed.  I'd say 75% or more of the time I'm looking a  
problem IP address it is part of a /19 or larger block with no sub- 
allocation.


Please read what I wrote:

"I would think that it's actually very easy to do when
sub-allocations are SWIP'ed."

I cannot, and will not, presuppose that in cases when they are
not SWIP'ed that some kind of magic happens. :-)

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.0 (Build 214)

wj8DBQFGGCw4q1pz9mNUZTMRAgEDAKCB4eiFluFcXcYlSj4EjleHpxy8PgCg26ei
sZW4CKfCOm5H3KOGQsxYd8w=
=ZoDl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: