nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 07:44:21 +0200 (CEST)
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Chris Owen wrote:
And how do you know the difference? The Cox IP address is SWIPed. Its even sub-allocated. The allocation is just a /19.
Exactly, so why not just block whatever the suballocation is? Would mean that companies that properly SWIP their IP-blocks and put in the effort to maintain them, are given an advantage to companies that do not.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks, (continued)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Kradorex Xeron (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks J. Oquendo (Apr 13)
- AOL Postmaster? Vish Yelsangikar (Apr 13)
- Re: AOL Postmaster? chuck goolsbee (Apr 13)
- RE: AOL Postmaster? Stasiniewicz, Adam (Apr 13)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Chris Owen (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Chris Owen (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Dave Pooser (Apr 07)
- RE: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Frank Bulk (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks John Levine (Apr 07)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Leo Vegoda (Apr 08)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Douglas Otis (Apr 08)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Paul Vixie (Apr 08)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Douglas Otis (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Christopher X. Candreva (Apr 09)
- Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks Florian Weimer (Apr 09)