nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent latency / congestion
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:17:21 -0400
If someone sabotages a rail to stop a train and the derailment takes out the fiber that is buried in the right-of-way, is that unintentional sabotage? At least of the fiber?
That's not sabotage at all.As it relates to the fiber, its not "deliberately and maliciously destroying [fiber]"... unless the goal was to cause a derailment which hurt the train operator both from the operation of the train and subsequent revenues they might lose from fiber operations along the same
right-of-way -- then *that* would be sabotage.In the case you outlined above, barring other motivations, the fiber would be "collateral damage".
That said, Cogent's page says nothing about sabotage (status.cogentco.com) and I can't find the reference on teliasonera's page.... Link please?
DJ
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion, (continued)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion David Ulevitch (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Kevin Oberman (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Dan Armstrong (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Mike Tancsa (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Kevin Oberman (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Steve Gibbard (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Mike Tancsa (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Mike Tancsa (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Eric Spaeth (Aug 20)
- RE: Cogent latency / congestion Rod Beck (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Kevin Oberman (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Deepak Jain (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Kevin Oberman (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Eric Spaeth (Aug 20)
- RE: Cogent latency / congestion Rod Beck (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Justin M. Streiner (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Zak Thompson (Aug 20)
- Re: Cogent latency / congestion Hex Star (Aug 20)