nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent latency / congestion


From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman () es net>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:31:56 -0700

Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:17:21 -0400
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>

If someone sabotages a rail to stop a train and the derailment takes out
the fiber that is buried in the right-of-way, is that unintentional
sabotage? At least of the fiber?

That's not sabotage at all.

As it relates to the fiber, its not "deliberately and maliciously 
destroying [fiber]"... unless the goal was to cause a derailment which 
hurt the train operator both from the operation of the train and 
subsequent revenues they might lose from fiber operations along the same
right-of-way -- then *that* would be sabotage.

In the case you outlined above, barring other motivations, the fiber 
would be "collateral damage".

That said, Cogent's page says nothing about sabotage 
(status.cogentco.com) and I can't find the reference on teliasonera's 
page.... Link please?

Too many people missed the emoticon. Clearly the fiber damage in the
case I gave was collateral damage. It would have been sabotage on the
rail line and the derailed train.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman () es net                       Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: