nanog mailing list archives
RE: San Francisco Power Outage
From: "Raymond L. Corbin" <rcorbin () hostmysite com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:36:59 -0400
They should have generators running...I can't foresee any good datacenter not having multiple generators to keep their customers servers online with UPS. -Ray -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Adrian Chadd Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:54 PM To: Seth Mattinen Cc: nanog list Subject: Re: San Francisco Power Outage On Tue, Jul 24, 2007, Seth Mattinen wrote:
I have a question: does anyone seriously accept "oh, power trouble" as
a
reason your servers went offline? Where's the generators? UPS? Testing
said combination of UPS and generators? What if it was important? I honestly find it hard to believe anyone runs a facility like that and people actually *pay* for it.
If you do accept this is a good reason for failure, why?
Didn't you read? He paid extra for super-reliable power from his electricity provider.. Adrian
Current thread:
- San Francisco Power Outage Jonathan Lassoff (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Seth Mattinen (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Adrian Chadd (Jul 24)
- RE: San Francisco Power Outage Raymond L. Corbin (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage John Kinsella (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Justin M. Streiner (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Michael Painter (Jul 25)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Adrian Chadd (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Seth Mattinen (Jul 24)
- Re: San Francisco Power Outage Jim Popovitch (Jul 24)
- RE: San Francisco Power Outage Alex Rubenstein (Jul 24)