nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox
From: Mattias Ahnberg <mattias () ahnberg pp se>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:20:52 +0200
Peter Dambier wrote:
The problem is, you dont know what is behind that probably NATted ip address. Probably you have 3 unix machines running smtp and uucp and a single infected windows box and maybe some VoIPs and ...
This is why I spoke of merely intercepting web traffic to inform, to not interrupt other services that may use the same link. I am in the same situation myself, sharing lots of stuff via the same fiber to my house. I even have TV through it. So I actually thought of that. And an ISP probably knows a bit more about their customer base than what we do, so this idea would ofcourse have to adapt to that. But as said, its a complicated matter and probably not a good idea either way before we know who is supposed to do what and for whom. -- /ahnberg.
Current thread:
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox, (continued)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox John C. A. Bambenek (Jul 22)
- RE: DNS Hijacking by Cox Marcus H. Sachs (Jul 22)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 22)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox James Hess (Jul 22)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Perry Lorier (Jul 23)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Sean Donelan (Jul 23)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox James Hess (Jul 23)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Perry Lorier (Jul 23)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Mattias Ahnberg (Jul 24)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Peter Dambier (Jul 24)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Mattias Ahnberg (Jul 25)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Peter Dambier (Jul 25)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Chris L. Morrow (Jul 24)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Brandon Galbraith (Jul 24)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Chris Adams (Jul 23)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox David Conrad (Jul 23)
- Re: DNS Hijacking by Cox Chris L. Morrow (Jul 22)