nanog mailing list archives

RE: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)


From: "Berkman, Scott" <Scott.Berkman () Reignmaker net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:39:49 -0700


All companies in all industries have a policy of stopping to provide
their services if a customer stops paying or violates the contract, I
really don't see this as a big/little provider argument.

Yes, the small provider should be multi-homed, otherwise a fiber cut or
outage can have this same effect.

To me the only part of this that is up for argument is did SaidCom
actually violate the contract and/or terms of use, and I certainly don't
have enough information beyond that one article to make that decision.
If someone else does please share with the group.

        -Scott

(As always just my 2 cents)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of
Frank Bulk
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:30 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)


http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/articlePrint.cfm?id=1310151

Is this a normal thing for Level 3 to do, cut off small, responsive
providers?

Frank


Current thread: