nanog mailing list archives
Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 20:14:22 +0530
On 5/13/07, Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net> wrote:
Difficult, as spam complaints generally include the original spam and thus trigger SpamAssassin (almost) just as hard. Otherwise, looking forward to your 98% effective procmail recipe
Start with something as simple as "to or cc your abuse desk" .. and ask yourself how many times your abuse desk has been bcc'd on email in the past. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?, (continued)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? K K (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Douglas Otis (May 13)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? John Levine (May 13)
- RE: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Stasiniewicz, Adam (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Al Iverson (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Gerry Boudreaux (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Niels Bakker (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? John Levine (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Al Iverson (May 13)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 13)