nanog mailing list archives

Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:42:48 -0400

On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:34:59 -0000, "Chris L. Morrow" said:
On Tue, 29 May 2007, John Curran wrote:
This changeover will not: 1) Fix the routing problem
inherent with present locator/endpoint binding, nor
2) solve your favorite fib/rib/cam/convergence limit,
nor 3) make the infrastructure inherently either
easier to operate or more secure.

but ipv6 is more secure, yes? :) (no it is not)

Does the relative security of IVp4 and IPv6 *really* matter on the same Internet
that has Vint Cerf's 140 million pwned machines on it?

Just askin', ya know?

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: