nanog mailing list archives
Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net
From: Eliot Lear <lear () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:51:14 +0100
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Most mailservers do allow you to exempt specific addresses from filtering.
On the LHS of the @ of a remote address? I think that was Sean's point. Eliot
Current thread:
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net, (continued)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Leigh Porter (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Adrian Chadd (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Joel Jaeggli (Nov 26)
- RE: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Jamie Bowden (Nov 26)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Paul Jakma (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Eliot Lear (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Eliot Lear (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 21)