nanog mailing list archives
Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net
From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:04:22 +0530
On Nov 21, 2007 6:21 PM, Eliot Lear <lear () cisco com> wrote:
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:Most mailservers do allow you to exempt specific addresses from filtering.On the LHS of the @ of a remote address? I think that was Sean's point.
Er, that bounce was from cox's mta, spamfiltering email to abuse () cox net -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net, (continued)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Adrian Chadd (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Joel Jaeggli (Nov 26)
- RE: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Jamie Bowden (Nov 26)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Paul Jakma (Nov 22)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Eliot Lear (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Eliot Lear (Nov 21)
- Re: unwise filtering policy from cox.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 21)