nanog mailing list archives
Re: Some thoughts on 240/4
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:19:57 -0400
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:00:02 EDT, Leo Bicknell said:
devices have been fixed, or we may find 5%. The problem is we neither know the timeframe in which we need it, nor do we know how fast vendors can get it fixed.
OK, everybody who thinks 240/4 is a Good Idea: How much ship date slip for the IPv6 features you need are you willing to accept when 240/4 updates blow the schedule? You can have all the IPv6 features you asked for on date X, or you can have it all plus 240/4 on date <X+N days>. What value of N are you willing to accept?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Some thoughts on 240/4 Eliot Lear (Oct 19)
- Re: Some thoughts on 240/4 Leo Bicknell (Oct 19)
- Re: Some thoughts on 240/4 Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: Some thoughts on 240/4 Leo Bicknell (Oct 19)
- Re: Some thoughts on 240/4 Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: Some thoughts on 240/4 Leo Bicknell (Oct 19)
- Re: Some thoughts on 240/4 Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: Some thoughts on 240/4 Leo Bicknell (Oct 20)
- Re: Some thoughts on 240/4 Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: Some thoughts on 240/4 Eliot Lear (Oct 19)
- RE: Some thoughts on 240/4 michael.dillon (Oct 19)
- Re: Some thoughts on 240/4 Leo Bicknell (Oct 19)