Re: Some thoughts on 240/4

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:48:57 EDT, Leo Bicknell said:

> In a message written on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:19:57AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
> > How much ship date slip for the IPv6 features you need are you willing to
> > accept when 240/4 updates blow the schedule?
>
> Why would the 240/4 updates blow the schedule?

More code, more regression testing, same number of programmers.  Do the math.

Take it as a given that it *will* slip the schedule some amount, because
the resources for a 240/4 feature will have to come from somewhere.  So
how much slippage are you willing to accept?

Attachment: _bin
Description: