nanog mailing list archives
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko () piuha net>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:26:46 +0300
Randy,
with all due respect, jari; maybe the number of groups is neither the problem nor the solution too much energy has been and is still being wasted dealing with overly cute/complex ideas these wgs invent to fancy up ipv6 so it will be deployed; from tla/nla/... to ula to sham6. this has prevented focusing on the real problems of deployment so they can be solved.
I know this very well. But I'm listening. We are already trying to do something about nat-pt. What else would you see as a priority? Jari
Current thread:
- Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6), (continued)
- Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Daniel Senie (Sep 28)
- Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Alain Durand (Sep 28)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Jeroen Massar (Sep 28)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Eliot Lear (Sep 28)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Mark Prior (Sep 30)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) John Curran (Sep 30)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Mark Prior (Sep 30)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) John Curran (Sep 30)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Jari Arkko (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: Fw: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 26)