nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
From: "TJ" <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:36:01 -0500
... not to mention that fact that IS-IS is, IMHO, a much nicer IGP to work
with. WRT that last sentence, that is an almost religious debate I was trying to avoid starting ... :) /TJ
Current thread:
- IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 devang patel (Dec 26)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 26)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Adam Armstrong (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Howard C. Berkowitz (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Adam Armstrong (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 28)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Adam Armstrong (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 26)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 devang patel (Dec 26)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mark Tinka (Dec 27)