nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb () netcases net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:04:43 -0500 (EST)
TJ wrote:
... not to mention that fact that IS-IS is, IMHO, a much nicer IGP to workwith. WRT that last sentence, that is an almost religious debate I was trying to avoid starting ... :)
I will offer a mantra that has helped me, over the years, about the indeed religious wars that emerge when a New Technology or Youthful feature comes to these two link state protocols. I begin to mutter "ISNT and OySPF".
Current thread:
- IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 devang patel (Dec 26)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 26)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Adam Armstrong (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Howard C. Berkowitz (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Adam Armstrong (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 28)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Adam Armstrong (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 26)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 devang patel (Dec 26)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 28)