nanog mailing list archives
Re: Failover solution using BGP
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:48:50 +0800
On Dec 31, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Naveen Nathan wrote:
Also they didn't want to subnet the space for the failover location, so it's all or nothing style routing.
Have they considered doing GSLB via DNS rather than playing routing games? Seems as if it might answer better, be less complex, et. al.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> // +852.9133.2844 mobile All behavior is economic in motivation and/or consequence.
Current thread:
- Failover solution using BGP Naveen Nathan (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Chris Ely (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Doug Schaapveld (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Chandler Bassett (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Braun, Mike (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Malte von dem Hagen (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Braun, Mike (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Austin Wilson (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP William Herrin (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Naveen Nathan (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Florian Weimer (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Roland Dobbins (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Florian Weimer (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Roland Dobbins (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Chris Ely (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Bryant Valencia (Dec 31)