nanog mailing list archives
RE: Failover solution using BGP
From: "Braun, Mike" <MBraun () firstam com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:19:33 -0800
Why not just AS prepend your secondary site if the services to the Internet are the same at both sites and tied to the same IP addresses? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Chandler Bassett [mailto:chandler.bassett () gmail com] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 4:15 PM To: Naveen Nathan Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Failover solution using BGP If the infrastructure is the same in both locations, why not load balance with stateful failover? If it's not the same in both locations, what are they doing for replication and the such in the event a site does go down? - Chandler On Dec 30, 2008, at 7:08 PM, Naveen Nathan wrote:
Hi, I would appreciate insight and experience for the following situation. I have a client that would like to announce a /18 & /19 over BGP in Sacramento and LA, us being the second location in LA. Our location will be a failover location incase Sacramento goes down. They want failover for extreme cases when they're completly down in Sacramento. They have strict requirements so that traffic to their blocks should exclusively go to Sacramento or LA. This seems difficult to automate and they are aware of this. They will contact their provider to stop announcing the blocks and subsequently contact us to announce their routes. I am wondering is there a better way to approaching the situation without resorting to announcing the routes when the client calls us and tells us to failover. This seems to be the inherent problem aswell because the customer wants this to be a manual process. -- Naveen Nathan To understand the human mind, understand self-deception. - Anon
-- THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE AND ANY FILES TRANSMITTED HEREWITH, ARE INTENDED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL(S) ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY OR PRIVILEGED INFORMATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE ADDRESSEE INDICATED IN THIS MESSAGE (OR RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERY OF THIS MESSAGE TO SUCH PERSON) YOU MAY NOT REVIEW, USE, DISCLOSE OR DISTRIBUTE THIS MESSAGE OR ANY FILES TRANSMITTED HEREWITH. IF YOU RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT THE SENDER BY REPLY E-MAIL AND DELETE THIS MESSAGE AND ALL COPIES OF IT FROM YOUR SYSTEM.
Current thread:
- Failover solution using BGP Naveen Nathan (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Chris Ely (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Doug Schaapveld (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Chandler Bassett (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Braun, Mike (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Malte von dem Hagen (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Braun, Mike (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Austin Wilson (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP William Herrin (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Naveen Nathan (Dec 30)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Florian Weimer (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Roland Dobbins (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Florian Weimer (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Roland Dobbins (Dec 31)
- Re: Failover solution using BGP Chris Ely (Dec 30)
- RE: Failover solution using BGP Bryant Valencia (Dec 31)