nanog mailing list archives
Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:46:24 +0100
* Owen DeLong:
If the vulnerability cannot be corrected through a vendor patch, then, one has to wonder what, exactly the vulnerability is.
You assume that a vendor patches a vulnerability once they learn about it. In my experience, this is not true. Sometimes it's easy to explain (product or vendor ceased to exist), sometimes it's not (some cross-site scripting issues I'm trying to straighten out; minor bugs to you perhaps, but huge media exposure because of their visibility and reproducibility--think FDIV bug).
Current thread:
- IBM report reviews Internet crime michael.dillon (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Owen DeLong (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Florian Weimer (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Owen DeLong (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Florian Weimer (Feb 13)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Florian Weimer (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Jim Popovitch (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Andre Gironda (Feb 12)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime JC Dill (Feb 13)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Andre Gironda (Feb 13)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Mark Radabaugh (Feb 13)
- RE: IBM report reviews Internet crime Frank Bulk (Feb 14)
- Re: IBM report reviews Internet crime Owen DeLong (Feb 12)