nanog mailing list archives
Re: Asymmetrical routing opinions/debate
From: "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:08:33 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- "Bill Stewart" <nonobvious () gmail com> wrote:
Essentially, if you don't control all the parts of the network that your packet uses, you're not able to directly set optimization parameters, so what you're doing to get symmetry is throwing lots of hints at the network and hoping some will stick, and the parts of the network that happen to cooperate with you may not be the best ones that are otherwise available.
I wish I could remember who to attribute this quote (maybe Geoff Huston?), but paraphrasing: "Asymmetric end-to-end traffic paths in The Internet is a fact of life. Get over it." :-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHjBWeq1pz9mNUZTMRAkW4AKCiIBfZtNamFrfrUY3ymOIhQcLr+ACeIVXP 7x/pIYWX1tqdicfaeFSOQzM= =LQxO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- Asymmetrical routing opinions/debate Drew Weaver (Jan 14)
- RE: Asymmetrical routing opinions/debate Darden, Patrick S. (Jan 14)
- Re: Asymmetrical routing opinions/debate William Herrin (Jan 14)
- RE: Asymmetrical routing opinions/debate Scott Morris (Jan 14)
- Re: Asymmetrical routing opinions/debate Bill Stewart (Jan 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Asymmetrical routing opinions/debate Paul Ferguson (Jan 14)
- Re: Asymmetrical routing opinions/debate Adrian Chadd (Jan 14)