nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software router state of the art
From: "Aaron Glenn" <aaron.glenn () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:37:21 -0700
On 7/28/08, Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us> wrote:
Junpier's J-series is a BSD based platform as far as I understand it. ImageStream is *much* more affordable for me, but is Linux-based, and I fear
...snip... AFAIK, none of Juniper's Juniper kit rocks BSD outside of the management interfaces and control plane (not even sure about the latter, tbh). someone feel free to correct me...
Current thread:
- Re: Software router state of the art, (continued)
- Re: Software router state of the art Charles Wyble (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Joe Greco (Jul 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Software router state of the art Seth Mattinen (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Deepak Jain (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Chris Stebner (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Jack Bates (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Chris Stebner (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Deepak Jain (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Christopher Morrow (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Kevin Day (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Aaron Glenn (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Eugeniu Patrascu (Jul 29)
- RE: Software router state of the art michael.dillon (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Seth Mattinen (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Rev. Jeffrey Paul (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Andrew D Kirch (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Seth Mattinen (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Joe Greco (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Bill Nash (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Florian Weimer (Jul 28)