nanog mailing list archives
Re: Off topic - RE: So why don't US citizens get this?
From: "Paul Wall" <pauldotwall () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:45:00 -0400
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:12 AM, <nancyp () yorku ca> wrote:
----Recommendation: Bandwidth purchase agreements (Service Level Agreements) that specify bandwidth, uptime and cost actually define connectivity thus they should contain a list of peers or network interconnections that will be maintained for the length of the agreement. Prepared by Nancy Paterson, York University July 23, 2008 nancyp () yorku ca
How many buyers out there have SLAs which cover inter-provider/domain connectivity? How many sellers are willing to guarantee this level of connectivity to their customers with a SLA? How many peering contracts are worth the paper they're printed on, and have teeth when subjected to attorney review, and none of the usual 30-90 day unilateral severability nonsense? Therein lies your problem. Drive Slow, Paul Wall
Current thread:
- Re: Arbitrary de-peering, (continued)
- Re: Arbitrary de-peering William Waites (Jul 28)
- Re: Arbitrary de-peering Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 28)
- Re: Arbitrary de-peering William Waites (Jul 28)
- RE: Arbitrary de-peering Randy Epstein (Jul 28)
- Re: Arbitrary de-peering Jon Lewis (Jul 28)
- RE: Arbitrary de-peering michael.dillon (Jul 28)
- Re: Arbitrary de-peering William Waites (Jul 28)
- Re: Arbitrary de-peering Jon Lewis (Jul 28)
- Re: Arbitrary de-peering Jay Hennigan (Jul 28)
- Re: Arbitrary de-peering Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 28)
- Re: Arbitrary de-peering William Waites (Jul 28)