nanog mailing list archives
Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora'sBox of
From: "Paul Wall" <pauldotwall () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:38:04 -0400
Gadi, I tried to find even the smallest token of operational relevance on your postings on this thread, and I'm coming up short. Could you please do us a favor and stop posting until such a time when you're able to comply with the list's AUP? Paul (not a member of MLC, my opinions only)
Current thread:
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs), (continued)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) David Conrad (Jun 27)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Scott Francis (Jun 27)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) David Conrad (Jun 27)
- RE: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora'sBox of David Schwartz (Jun 28)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora'sBox of Joe Greco (Jun 28)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora'sBox of Peter Beckman (Jun 29)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora'sBox of Jim Popovitch (Jun 29)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora'sBox of Gadi Evron (Jun 29)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora'sBox of Paul Wall (Jun 30)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora'sBox of Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Jun 30)