nanog mailing list archives
Re: 3rd party network monitoring
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:32:27 +0100
John A. Kilpatrick wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Tom Sands wrote:When we did get a hold of someone, they mentioned they could support simple ICMP requests.To them "simple" means it's just a ping check. They won't montior/graph/care about latency.I was pondering creating a "smoke ping collective". Get a bunch of guys to agree to run smokeping and monitor each other. That's a great tool for visualizing changes in latency and works just as well with ICMP as with HTTP.
There is this really awesome project from RIPE (like usual ;) Please check, and start using RIPE TTM: http://www.ripe.net/ttm/ See the site for presentations, tools, info, etc etc etc etc... Enjoy ;) Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- 3rd party network monitoring Darrell Hyde (Mar 04)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Drew Linsalata (Mar 04)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Matt Peterson (Mar 04)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Thomas Kuehling (Mar 05)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Tom Sands (Mar 05)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring John A. Kilpatrick (Mar 06)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jeroen Massar (Mar 06)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jason LeBlanc (Mar 07)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jason LeBlanc (Mar 07)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jeroen Massar (Mar 07)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jason LeBlanc (Mar 07)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Jeroen Massar (Mar 07)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Tom Sands (Mar 05)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Eddy Martinez (Mar 05)
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Matt (Mar 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 3rd party network monitoring Ethan Katz-Bassett (Mar 11)