nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 09:58:46 +0800
On Tue, May 06, 2008, Nathan Ward wrote:
Maybe you just start calling "10Mbps" "10Mbps, assuming a 500b average packet size." Anyway, nice idea in theory - putting more real world limitations in to sold product limitations - but I don't see it working out with marketing people, etc. unless someone has been doing it for years already. It'd be good if the world were all engineers though, huh?
NPE-XXX, anyone? Adrian _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG () nanog org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Marc Manthey (May 04)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Adrian Chadd (May 04)
- [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Message not available
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Niels Bakker (May 05)
- [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Mike Fedyk (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Nathan Ward (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Adrian Chadd (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Adrian Chadd (May 04)