nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 06:57:36 +0800
On Mon, May 05, 2008, Marc Manthey wrote:
evening all , found an related article about the power consumtion saving in ip6. - Up to 300 Megawatt Worth of Keepalive Messages to be Saved by IPv6? http://www.circleid.com/posts/81072_megawatts_keepalive_ipv6/ http://www.niksula.hut.fi/~peronen/publications/haverinen_siren_eronen_vtc2007.pdf
I'd seriously be looking at making current -software- run more efficiently before counting ipv6-related power savings. Adrian _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG () nanog org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Marc Manthey (May 04)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Adrian Chadd (May 04)
- [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Message not available
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Niels Bakker (May 05)
- [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Mike Fedyk (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Nathan Ward (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Adrian Chadd (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Adrian Chadd (May 04)