nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 routing /48s
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:02:41 +1300
On 18/11/2008, at 11:46 AM, [1]Robert.E.VanOrmer () frb gov wrote: We have been delegated a /48 by ARIN. We then went out to procure a native IPv6 T1 from Verizon (*mainly for testing*). We requested that Verizon route the /48 that we were provided by ARIN. Verizon's response was "they do not route network smaller than a /32". I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers. They are in "critical infrastructure" space, which is a single /32 with /48s assigned[1] from that - or something like that. IXP space was mentioned.. I'm not sure that needs to be globally reachable. Maybe to stop uRPF breaking ICMP messages if routers on the exchange respond from their interface address.. though.. I'd prefer to make my routers respond from loopback or something. -- Nathan Ward [1] Maybe I mean allocated, whatever. -- Nathan Ward References 1. mailto:Robert.E.VanOrmer () frb gov
Current thread:
- IPv6 routing /48s Robert . E . VanOrmer (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mark Tinka (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nick Hilliard (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Kevin Oberman (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joe Abley (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Frank Habicht (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nathan Ward (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joe Maimon (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joel Jaeggli (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jeroen Massar (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Perry Lorier (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Florian Weimer (Nov 19)