nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 routing /48s
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:43:20 -0800
Michael Sinatra wrote:
On 11/18/08 9:26 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net> wrote:I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers. They are in "critical infrastructure" space, which is a single /32 withtraceroute6 to the ISC's v6 allocation(s) for f-root ... (from inside 701) oh, not working... traceroute6 to ipv6.google.com from inside 701, oh... not working either. vzb's v6 table is far from complete :( which is pretty painful.And it just reinforces the fear that people have against putting AAAA records in DNS for their publicly-accessible resources, especially www.
oddly enough I kind of expect my settlement free upstream to have somewhat fewer routes than say those tier-2s that I also buy transit from.
michael
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nick Hilliard (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Kevin Oberman (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joe Abley (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Frank Habicht (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Owen DeLong (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nathan Ward (Nov 17)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joe Maimon (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joel Jaeggli (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jeroen Massar (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Perry Lorier (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Florian Weimer (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nathan Ward (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mohacsi Janos (Nov 20)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Florian Weimer (Nov 21)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 21)