nanog mailing list archives
Re: ingress SMTP
From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 23:47:31 +0000 (GMT)
JS> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:56:51 -0400 JS> From: Justin Scott JS> Have you ever tried to have Joe Sixpack call BigISP support to ask JS> for an exception to a port block on his consumer-class connection JS> with a dynamic IP? In my experience, most people capable of preventing outbound 25/TCP abuse also are capable of requesting "please allow me unfiltered 25/TCP access to the entire world". Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/ Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita ________________________________________________________________________ DO NOT send mail to the following addresses: davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked. Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
Current thread:
- RE: ingress SMTP, (continued)
- RE: ingress SMTP Frank Bulk (Sep 13)
- Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Stephen Sprunk (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Simon Waters (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Justin Scott (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Daniel Senie (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Chris Boyd (Sep 03)
- Why not go after bots? (was: ingress SMTP) Michael Thomas (Sep 03)
- Re: Why not go after bots? Charles Wyble (Sep 03)
- Re: Why not go after bots? (was: ingress SMTP) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 03)
- RE: Why not go after bots? (was: ingress SMTP) Frank Bulk (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Steven Champeon (Sep 03)
- Re: ingress SMTP Alec Berry (Sep 04)