nanog mailing list archives

Re: IXP


From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:11:14 -0400

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:12:24 +0000
Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org> wrote:

Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:17:11 -0400
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:58:24 +0000
bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:

  i make the claim that simple, clean design and execution
is best. even the security goofs will agree.   

"Even"?  *Especially* -- or they're not competent at doing security.

wouldn't a security person also know about

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARP_spoofing

I'm taking no position on the underlying argument; I'm simply stating
that simplicity is an essential element for security.  I like a
philosophy I've seen attributed to Einstein: "everything should be as
simple as possible, and no simpler".

And yes, I know about ARP spoofing...


                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb


Current thread: