nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:21:10 -0400
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:58:01PM -0500, Clue Store wrote: [snip]
would like to go with , but I have had some in the industry say this is not as good as running an IGP with the customer.
Name and shame. TTBOMK, no-one who thought walking that road was a Good Idea did so for long after starting down the path. As far as 'customer choice' goes, the customer is indeed always right when it comes to their *desired goal* in the abstract (multihoming, etc), but rarely if ever in its implementation. Cheers, Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Jack Bates (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Nick Hilliard (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Marko Milivojevic (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Joe Provo (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Randy Bush (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 19)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Andy Davidson (Aug 20)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Ivan Pepelnjak (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Roland Dobbins (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Philip Smith (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 20)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Ivan Pepelnjak (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Gary T. Giesen (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Steve Bertrand (Aug 20)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Ivan Pepelnjak (Aug 20)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Clue Store (Aug 20)